Preface
This section of the Recognition Scheme document contains the principles
and criteria to which the QAA will refer when considering the fitness of
a body to hold an AVA licence. The principles and criteria have been developed
to provide assurance of the quality of the structures, operations and procedures
of AVAs, in order to ensure that they are able to secure the quality of
Access to HE provision, its continuing fitness for purpose and the sufficiency
and consistency of its standards. The principles provide the context for
the criteria, by supplying the fundamental objectives of AVA licensing.
The licensing criteria define the requirements for the award and renewal
of AVA licences, but they may be met in different ways by different organisations.
In the process for licensing and re-licensing of AVAs, QAA will consider
all relevant information and circumstances in order to assess whether the
criteria have been met. Organisations will be encouraged to demonstrate
how, in relation to their own circumstances, they have addressed these
criteria. The indicative evidence statements have been developed on the
basis of existing good practice in AVAs, and are included in order to provide
examples of some of the ways in which organisations may be able to demonstrate
that they have met the criteria. An AVA may be able to demonstrate that
it has met the criteria through alternative means. Where indicative evidence
statements are provided for a particular criterion, these do not constitute
a set of necessary and sufficient conditions. In some instances, where
an organisation is being considered for an initial licence, such evidence
will not always be available, as it will depend on some activity having
taken place. An assessment of its ability to meet the criteria, will, in
these instances, be based on the description of the structures, systems
and processes which it intends to implement.
For the purposes of this document, the organisation to which an AVA licence
is awarded by QAA is referred to as 'the AVA', irrespective of whether
or not it has other responsibilities in addition to those related to Access
to HE.
The principles for the licensing and re-licensing of AVAs
-
The organisation has a structure which is based on a partnership of members,
including institutions which provide Access to HE programmes and institutions
of higher education.
-
The organisation has governance structures which allow it to discharge
its AVA responsibilities securely.
-
The organisation is aware of, and in a position to meet, its legal and
public obligations.
-
The organisation is able to manage effectively its AVA responsibilities
and the structure which supports them.
-
The organisation is able to assure the quality and fitness for purpose
of Access to HE programmes at the point at which they are granted formal
recognition.
-
The organisation is able to safeguard the continuing quality of Access
to HE programmes, and to secure the standards of achievement of students
awarded the Access to HE certificate.
-
The organisation is underpinned by structures and processes which enable
it to review, evaluate and develop the Access to HE provision for which
it has responsibility.
The criteria for the licensing and re-licensing of AVAs
Principle 1
The organisation has a structure which is based on a partnership
of members, including institutions which provide Access to HE programmes
and institutions of higher education.
Criteria
The organisation will be able to demonstrate that:
1.1 it is responsible to a consortium or other structure including both
institutions providing Access to HE programmes and at least two higher
education institutions which receive Access to HE students;
1.2 the consortium or other structure itself will not be a provider of
Access to HE programmes or a receiver of Access to HE students;
1.3 there are formal agreements between the organisation and the suppliers
of any goods or services which are integral to the operation of the AVA
(including where the supplier is one of its own members), which define
the separation of the responsibilities, liabilities and authority of each
party;
1.4 it has sufficient numbers of members to secure its operational viability,
and the institutions in membership will be able to provide appropriate
experience and expertise for sound governance and for informed decision-making
in relation to Access to HE matters;
1.5 there is a clear and transparent process for admitting organisations
into membership;
Indicative evidence
-
there are explicit criteria for membership;
-
the rights and obligations of members are specified;
-
criteria for refusing, suspending or withdrawing membership status
are specified
-
a description of processes is readily available.
Principle 2
The organisation has governance structures which allow it to discharge
its AVA responsibilities securely.
Criteria
The organisation will be able to demonstrate that:
2.1 it has a formal constitution which provides a description of its legal
identity, functions, aims, and structures;
2.2 the constitutional arrangements and governance structures ensure that
it is formally required to render itself accountable to its members, and
protect the organisation from the undue influence of any one of, or a minority
group of, its members;
Indicative evidence
-
members from both the FE and HE sectors are represented within the
organisation's advisory and decision-making structures;
2.3 responsibilities are clearly specified within the governance structures
for:
-
the oversight and effective control of legal and financial matters;
-
strategic direction and policy development;
-
organisational structures and management; and
-
the quality assurance of Access to HE provision;
2.4 decisions about AVA matters are made by accountable and properly constituted
bodies;
Indicative evidence
-
decision-making structures, and reporting lines and mechanisms, within
the organisation are clear;
-
the remits, responsibilities and authority of all decision-making
bodies are specified, and their proceedings and decisions are properly
recorded;
-
the membership of decision-making bodies is specified, and includes
representation of the organisation's members from both providers of Access
to HE programmes and representatives of higher education institutions
receiving Access to HE students;
-
the criteria for the appointment or election of members to decision-making
bodies are clear and the process is transparent;
2.5 where the organisation has responsibilities in addition to those related
to Access to HE, there is a clearly specified locus of authority for its
AVA responsibilities within its governance structures;
2.6 its major AVA responsibilities lie with the organisation itself and
not with its officers or with any one of its individual members or an external
body;
Indicative evidence
-
responsibility for the final approval of Access to HE programmes is
specifically located within the AVA's governance structures;
-
responsibility for the award of Access to HE certificates to students
does not lie outside the AVA;
-
responsibility for taking major governance decisions is clearly specified
within the remits of the organisation's principal governing body, and
cannot be delegated to officers without explicit approval and monitoring
by the relevant body
-
the annual AVA report to QAA is formally approved by the body which
holds responsibility for the AVA licence;
-
the extent and limits of authority of bodies holding devolved responsibilities
are clearly defined in relation to AVA matters;
-
there are monitoring and reporting procedures in place which ensure
that any delegated activities are properly undertaken.
Principle 3
The organisation is aware of and in a position to meet its legal
and public obligations.
Criteria
The organisation will be able to demonstrate that:
3.1 its constitutional basis is clear and readily identifiable;
Indicative evidence
-
the organisation is able to provide a convincing rationale and reason(s)
for its constitutional basis;
3.2 either its legal identity ensures that its liability exists
separately from that of its individual members and their individual representatives, or it
has taken steps to limit its liability and that of its individual members,
so far as is possible, through insurance;
Indicative evidence
-
the organisation has taken legal advice about the appropriateness
of its legal identity to meet its public obligations, and has taken a
well-considered decision on the basis of the advice received;
3.3 there is a clearly identified basis on which it is able to enter into
formal legally binding agreements;
3.4 either its legal status requires it to have formally regulated
financial arrangements or it has established an appropriate agency
arrangement through which its financial affairs are scrutinised;
3.5 its constitutional basis or relationship to any other organisation
does not restrict the independent decision-making or operation of the AVA
as specified under the terms of this licence.
Principle 4
The organisation is able to manage effectively its AVA responsibilities
and the structure which supports them.
Criteria
The organisation will be able to demonstrate that:
4.1 it has aims which are congruent with the Aims of the QAA Recognition
Scheme for Access to HE;
4.2 it has systematic and effective mechanisms which enable it to pursue
its aims;
Indicative evidence
-
it operates a regular strategic planning process;
-
it has strategic and operational objectives which include objectives
relating to the development and/or enhancement of Access to HE provision;
-
it has specific targets related to meeting its declared objectives
for Access to HE;
-
it identifies specific actions and responsibilities to lead to the
achievement of its targets;
-
it has the means to meet its targets;
-
it has arrangements in place for monitoring, evaluating and reporting
on the achievement of targets;
-
policies and plans relating to Access to HE are systematically reviewed
and revised, taking account of the outcomes of the monitoring process;
-
its arrangements take account of, and make effective use of, the views
of Access to HE programme providers and receivers of Access to HE students
within the membership of the organisation;
-
its staff are aware of its aims and plans, and can identify their
own roles in meeting the AVA's aims;
4.3 it has established procedures to review the AVA's performance in relation
to its aims;
Indicative evidence
-
it makes use of statistical and other data to review its performance;
-
it keeps explicit records of the AVA's achievement in relation to
its stated objectives for the year;
4.4 it operates a systematic and rigorous approach to the management of
its financial affairs;
Indicative evidence
-
it has budgeting mechanisms for forward planning in relation to expected
income and projected expenditure, and which take account of the AVA's
objectives and specific targets;
-
there are clear processes and systems through which it records, controls
and monitors financial decision-making and transactions, in respect of
current and projected operational needs;
-
it operates standard accounting procedures and is able to produce
annual accounts appropriate for inclusion in the annual report to QAA;
4.5 there is a level and structure of staffing and physical resources capable
of delivering the requirements described in this document;
Indicative evidence
-
there is an identified administrative base, and its facilities and
administrative systems are sufficient to manage its operation and AVA
responsibilities;
-
responsibility for the effective day-to-day management and leadership
of the organisation is clearly located;
-
staff training and development is available to its staff;
4.6 its staff are fully accountable to it through clear management lines;
4.7 it provides appropriate services to support its processes for the quality
assurance and enhancement of Access to HE provision;
4.8 it has documented statements describing its operational procedures
relating to Access to HE, including statements relating to registration
of students with the AVA; the development and recognition of programmes;
the receipt of moderators'/examiners' reports; and the award and issue
to students of Access to HE certificates;
4.9 it has effective systems for the collection, recording and holding
of data about Access to HE programmes and students, and is able to provide
accurate and timely information to satisfy QAA's reporting requirements;
4.10 it communicates to its members effectively about matters relating
to Access to HE;
Indicative evidence
-
it has mechanisms to inform providers directly and promptly of regulatory
matters relating to the design and delivery of Access to HE programmes;
-
AVA policies and procedures are documented and are made widely available
to its members;
-
its formal aims and plans in relation to Access to HE are documented
and disseminated to its members;
-
it engages in activities which promote the AVA's activities
and Access to HE more generally;
-
it disseminates regular reports on its AVA activities to its members;
4.11 it has an approved equal opportunities policy, the implementation
of which is evident in relation to its activities, processes and procedures;
4.12 it has procedures in place, which are easily understood and readily
accessible, to enable complaints, grievances and appeals to be received,
considered and resolved fairly;
4.13 it has procedures for monitoring and assessing the continuing quality
and effectiveness of its management and operation, including consideration
of potential risks to its operation, and mechanisms to ensure that appropriate
action is taken;
4.14 it is able to produce an annual report on its activities and the Access
to HE provision for which it has responsibility, in accordance with the
requirements from QAA.
Principle 5
The organisation is able to assure the quality and fitness for purpose
of Access to HE programmes to which it grants formal recognition.
Criteria
The organisation will be able to demonstrate that:
5.1 it operates a system of programme development which encourages providers
to present programmes for recognition that are explicitly designed to prepare
students from under-represented groups for study in higher education, and
which meet the AVA's specific requirements;
Indicative evidence
-
it has an established process to advise those developing Access to
HE programmes about the AVA's requirements in relation to:
-
the process and procedures for programme development and recognition;
-
the form and content for the documentation to be submitted for
programme validation;
-
AVA policies about Access to HE programme design;
-
the AVA specification for the award of Access to HE certificate;
-
the process for the development of Access to HE programmes involves
consultation with representatives with relevant expertise working in
higher education;
5.2 there are standard systems and procedures for the recognition of programmes
which ensure externality, objectivity and consistency of process in the
consideration of Access to HE programme submissions;
Indicative evidence
-
there are established criteria for the membership and composition
of validation panels, to include representation of:
-
providers of Access to HE programmes (external to those applying
to deliver the programme)
-
receivers of Access to HE students in higher education
-
relevant curriculum expertise for the programme being validated;
-
panel members receive programme documentation for consideration in
advance of the validation panel;
-
panel members are made aware of the purpose and conduct of the validation
panel;
-
the roles and responsibilities of panel members and any AVA officers
attending a panel are made clear;
-
those responsible for developing the programme are not involved in
the validation decision;
-
the possible outcomes of a validation event are made clear to members
of the panel in advance of the event;
5.3 the AVA operates rigorous processes for programme recognition which
ensure consistency of outcome in relation to the quality and fitness for
purpose of Access to HE programmes;
Indicative evidence
-
there are established and specified criteria for assessing Access
to HE programme submissions which involve consideration of the programme
as a preparation for study in higher education for the programme's major
intended progression route(s) and target groups and, which include, specifically,
the appropriateness of:
-
the programme's aims, objectives and intended learning outcomes;
-
the specified target groups, and methods for targeting and recruiting
those from those groups;
-
requirements and arrangements for admission to the programme,
including pre-course guidance;
-
availability to students of academic and personal support;
-
curriculum design and content with reference to the acquisition
of an appropriate balance of subject knowledge and academic skills;
-
programme organisation and methods to assure the coherence of
individual students' programmes of study;
-
teaching strategies and methods of assessment;
-
methods for identifying and recording students' achievement;
-
the specification of learning requirements for the award of the
Access to HE certificate;
-
programme management responsibilities and arrangements;
-
assurance by the provider of appropriate resources, facilities,
staffing, and staff development where necessary;
-
the methods to be used for student evaluation and feedback;
-
the provider's arrangements for programme monitoring and evaluation.
-
there are adequate and efficient systems in place for:
-
the administration of validation panels
-
identifying the availability of potential moderator(s) prior to
programme recognition;
-
recording panel outcomes;
-
clearly identifying any action to be taken, by whom and within
what timescale;
-
circulating panel outcomes to panel members;
-
referring the panel's recommendation to the appropriate AVA body
for formal approval;
-
monitoring and verifying the implementation of agreed actions
to satisfy any conditions set by the validation panel;
-
notifying the provider of the formal approval of the programme,
once any conditions have been met;
-
maintaining up-to-date records of definitive programme documentation,
of all validation outcomes, including conditional validation with
details of follow through to final approval;
-
there are rigorous and reliable mechanisms for establishing and maintaining
'GCSE-equivalence' of courses within any Access programme to be offered
for admission to initial teacher training programmes in higher education
5.4 The recognition of an Access to HE programme is made with the full
authority and approval of the AVA.
Indicative evidence
-
a validation panel recommends formal recognition of the programme
to an appropriate body within the AVA prior to its delivery;
-
there is a clear system for ensuring that all conditions are met prior
to the delivery of a new programme.
Principle 6
The organisation is able to safeguard the continuing quality of Access
to HE programmes, and to secure the standards of achievement of students
awarded the Access to HE certificate.
Criteria
The organisation will be able to demonstrate that:
6.1 it has established a system of regular external programme monitoring
and assessment ('moderation') through which the quality, comparability
and fitness for purpose of Access to HE programmes, and the consistency
and sufficiency of standards of student achievement, are assured;
Indicative evidence
-
it has a clearly specified definition of the function of moderation,
to include maintenance and enhancement of the quality and fitness for
purpose of Access to HE programmes; monitoring the student experience
on the programme; verification of standards of student achievements leading
to the granting of the Access to HE certificate; and overview of the
conduct of assessment, ensuring fairness to students and that the validation
requirements of the programme are met;
-
moderation processes pay due regard to objectivity, impartiality,
fairness and equity;
-
the moderation process ensures that all Access to HE awards are consistent
within the AVA and nationally against any approved benchmarked criteria;
-
there is a clear specification for the operation of its process of
moderation, including the purpose and number of visits, the activities
to be undertaken, criteria for the sampling of evidence of student achievement,
and processes for verifying and monitoring the standards achieved by
students;
-
where its own process of moderation makes use of providers' internal
moderation or verification procedures, there is a clear system for approving
and monitoring those procedures, and the articulation between the systems
of internal and external moderation is clear;
-
where there is more than one moderator for a programme, or the organisation
operates a system with different categories of moderators, the respective
responsibilities of different moderators are clearly identified, and
relationship between them is clearly stated;
6.2 it has procedures that will ensure that those who act on the AVA's
behalf to monitor the quality of Access to HE programmes and the standards
of student achievement ('moderators') are competent to do so;
Indicative evidence
-
there are clear criteria and transparent mechanisms for the selection
of moderators, including appropriate expertise, curriculum knowledge
and relevant experience in adult, further or higher education;
-
moderators are external to the provider and have a sufficient degree
of independence from the admissions process of related programmes within
any receiving institution to ensure that there is no potential conflict
of interest;
-
moderators are appointed by, and responsible to, the AVA and not to
a providing or receiving institution;
-
there are explicit contractual arrangements between the moderator
and the AVA, which set out the moderator's duties and term of service;
-
a sufficient number of moderators is appointed to give adequate and
expert attention, and subject expertise to the numbers and range of curriculum
studies on the Access to HE programme, and to ensure that the moderation
of student achievement is thorough, rigorous and fair;
-
there is provision for the induction and training of new moderators
that will enable them to carry out their role effectively, including
clear guidelines detailing the nature of the AVA's moderation process;
their roles and responsibilities; and the authority with which they are
entitled to act;
-
there are established mechanisms to enable moderators to compare standards
and judgements across different programmes;
-
there are mechanisms through which moderators are updated on any changes
in AVA or national policy and practice;
-
there are mechanisms through which the AVA monitors moderators' performance,
and responds appropriately where the performance is deemed to be unsatisfactory;
-
there is a process through which the AVA can terminate a moderator's
employment, if necessary;
6.3 it makes use of the outcomes of the moderation process to improve and
enhance recognised Access to HE programmes;
Indicative evidence
-
there is clear guidance for moderators on the nature, structure, content,
frequency and submission of moderation reports;
-
there are procedures for receiving and responding to moderation reports;
processes for ensuring that tutors and heads of providing organisations
receive copies of moderators' reports; and procedures for ensuring that
recommendations and other matters arising from the reports are acted
upon within an agreed timescale;
-
there are clear procedures for action to be taken in the event of
providers failing to address issues raised in moderation or other reports
to ensure that quality and standards of the programme are safeguarded,
including procedures for the ultimate sanction of withdrawal of an Access
to HE programme's approval;
-
the outcomes of the moderation process are analysed and reviewed by
the AVA;
6.4 it has specified procedures for the award of Access to HE certificates
to students, according to clear criteria;
Indicative evidence
-
formal authority for the award of Access to HE certificates is clearly
located;
-
there is clear guidance about the function and process of a final
assessment meeting;
-
there are effective systems and procedures to ensure consistent application
of the programme specification of required learning achievement for the
award of the Access to HE certificate;
-
verified evidence of achievement is required before the award of the
Access to HE certificates can be made;
-
recommendations for the award of Access to HE certificates are approved
only after the process for moderation has been completed;
-
all students on Access to HE programmes who complete the required
learning achievement, as specified in the approved programme documentation,
will be awarded Access to HE certificates by the AVA;
6.5 it has a regulated process for the issue of Access to HE certificates
to students;
Indicative evidence
-
certificates have a standard format which include the specific title
of the award; the name of the AVA; and the authorised Access to HE logo,
including the words ‘recognised by the Quality Assurance Agency
for Higher Education';
-
there are secure administrative procedures for the issue of certificates,
and for recording the issue and re-issue of certificates;
-
no indication of grading appears on Access to HE certificates;
-
providers are able to supply to students and to higher education institutions
a profile, record or transcript of student achievement relating to successful
fulfilment of the criteria for the granting of the award.
Principle 7
The organisation is underpinned by structures and processes which
enable it to review, evaluate and develop the Access to HE provision for
which it has responsibility.
Criteria
The organisation will be able to demonstrate that:
7.1 it has a rigorous system for the regular review and development of
AVA activities and procedures, and of Access to HE provision with reference
to quality and comparability of programmes and consistency of student outcomes;
Indicative evidence
-
it has specified requirements for regular monitoring and self-assessment
of Access to HE programmes by providers, including requirements to provide
a critical appraisal of the operation of programmes which addresses:
-
the effectiveness of targeting in relation to recruitment;
-
the quality of the students' experience;
-
standards of student achievement;
-
student retention, completion and progression;
-
response to moderation and planned actions;
-
it has mechanisms to identify matters of concern arising from moderation
and review processes; to address matters identified; to stipulate those
responsible for taking action; and to indicate an appropriate timescale
within which such action should be taken;
-
data on Access to HE programmes and students, including an appropriate
cohort analysis, is formally considered within the AVA;
-
it has mechanisms through which it is able to identify and disseminate
good practice;
-
it has systems through which the AVA evaluates its own procedures;
-
the outcomes of the review procedures are fed into the AVA's planning
processes;
7.2 it has a system for the periodic re-validation of programmes which
assure their continuing quality and fitness for purpose;
Indicative evidence
-
the process of re-validation takes account of the outcomes of the
programme monitoring and review procedures.
Standard conditions of approval
The following standard conditions attached to the award of licences to
an AVA require the AVA to provide an explicit written statement, which
indicates that:
-
the AVA will conform with, and abide by, the principles and criteria
and operational guidance set out in the QAA Recognition Scheme for
Access to HE to Higher Education in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and
in any other documents relating to Access to HE to HE, as published from
time to time by QAA;
-
the AVA will follow the procedures set out in its licence application
and/or those approved in subsequent submissions to QAA;
-
resources are available to the AVA for implementing the procedures set
out in its documentation;
-
information about the AVA and its activities, and the Access to HE programmes
which it recognises, will be provided from time to time, as requested
by QAA;
-
the AVA will cooperate with and participate in QAA's procedures for the
monitoring and review of AVAs;
-
the AVA will not devolve to another agency any part of those responsibilities
described in its submissions and approved by QAA.